Every token project names its allocations differently — one calls it 'Core Contributors,' another calls it 'Team & Advisors,' a third calls it 'Founders.' This inconsistency makes cross-project comparison impossible without standardization. Tokenomist solves this by mapping every project's allocation labels into six beneficiary categories, creating a universal framework for analyzing who holds what across the entire market. The six categories are precisely defined. Founder/Team covers people who have the most ownership and responsibility to drive business and product — founders, core contributors, employees, and advisors. Private Investors includes entities that provide capital in rounds not publicly accessible, often at lower valuations — seed, Series A, strategic investors. Public Investors covers investment offerings available to the general public through launchpads or exchanges — IDOs, IEOs, public sales. Reserved captures strategic reserves whose purpose is not clearly stated or held by foundations and DAOs — treasuries, ecosystem funds, strategic reserves. Community covers incentives designed to bootstrap the network and reward active participation — staking rewards, airdrops, liquidity mining, grants. Other is any allocation that does not fit into the other standard categories. This classification unlocks powerful analytical capabilities. You can compare what percentage of supply goes to insiders (Founder/Team + Private Investors) versus the public (Public Investors + Community) across hundreds of projects. You can identify which category drives the most near-term unlock pressure, or find projects where the Reserved category dominates — signaling significant TBD locked supply. Tokenomist's Allocation Screener and Allocation Comparison tools are built on this framework.