Build and Backtest Tokenomist API
Get Free Trial API Now
Tokenomist

Public Sale

A funding round announced to the public and open to public participants, run as an ICO, IDO or IEO and settled before or at the token generation event. In Tokenomist's standardised allocation framework it is the Public Investors category, which averaged roughly 4.6% of supply across the 2022 to 2023 sample, down from about 35% in 2018. It is usually the shortest-vesting tranche on the cap table.
TradFi parallel: Closest to the retail tranche of an IPO, minus the lockup discipline. The book is open to the public rather than to invited investors alone, the price is fixed or auctioned, and in most cases the allocation is free to trade the day it lists.

Key Takeaways

  • 01
    A public sale is any round announced to the public and open to public participants, whether an ICO, IDO or IEO, and maps to Tokenomist's Public Investors category
  • 02
    The category has shrunk from roughly 35% of supply in 2018 to about 5% in 2023, averaging near 4.6% across the 2022 to 2023 sample, as private rounds took the space
  • 03
    Public tranches vest short: 75% of public sale vesting periods end before 8.8 months, so this supply usually reaches the market early
  • 04
    Jurisdiction can split one tranche in two. Plasma unlocked non-US public buyers at mainnet beta while locking US buyers for 12 months to July 28, 2026
  • 05
    Mechanism varies and is priced by the market: Monad sold at a fixed $0.025 with no auction, while Aligned ran a second round as an English auction and drew a mixed reaction
  • 06
    The sale price is the reference cost basis for retail. Pump.fun's $0.004 ICO implied a $4B valuation that its FDV later sat about 68% below

How It Works

Tokenomist defines the category plainly: public sales "are announced to the public and involve public participants, whether through ICOs, IDOs, or IEOs". That is the line separating it from the Private Investor bucket, which covers venture funds, seed buyers and project partners in rounds that are not publicly accessible and are usually priced lower. Both are investors; only one of them had to be invited. The distinction matters for supply analysis because the two tranches carry different sizes, different entry prices and, most importantly, very different lockups.
The size of the category has collapsed over a decade. Tokenomist's allocation research cites Binance's tokenomics work finding that before 2018 many high market-cap tokens sold over 40% of total supply publicly, with Ethereum and Binance at roughly 83.5% and 50% respectively. That era ended badly: Statis Group estimated around 80% of ICOs were scams, and academic work by Benedetti and Kostovetsky and by Howell and co-authors found that on average 54% to 60% of total token supply was dumped during an ICO. Founders responded by cutting the public tranche from about 35% in 2018 to 5% in 2023 while private investor allocations grew. The pattern also splits by size: larger market cap projects allocate fewer tokens to public sales than smaller ones do, funding themselves through other means and holding more in foundation or treasury, while smaller projects sell more publicly to attract initial investors.
What has not changed is the vesting. Tokens sold in public sales generally do not carry long vesting periods, and Tokenomist's research puts 75% of public sale vesting periods as ending before 8.8 months. In practice that means buyers can sell shortly after purchase, so a public tranche tends to reach the market early in a token's life rather than sitting behind a multi-year schedule. Jurisdiction is the common exception, and it can split one tranche in half. Plasma sold 10% of supply (1,000,000,000 XPL) publicly, with non-US purchasers unlocked at mainnet beta launch and US purchasers locked for 12 months to July 28, 2026. On a 50/50 split assumption that lockup was one of the reasons initial released supply came in near 13% of total tokens rather than 18%.
Mechanism and pricing are where public sales now differ most from each other, and both feed straight into cost basis. Coinbase ran Monad's sale from November 17 to 22, 2025 at a fixed price of $0.025, with no auction mechanics, a clear FDV up front, an allocation model favouring smaller orders to reduce whale dominance, and TGE plus mainnet two days after close. Aligned went the other way: a CoinList sale in January 2025 offering 1.67% of supply and raising up to $10M across multiple pricing tranches, then a second public round more than a year later structured as an English auction for roughly 1% of supply, which softened retail sentiment through the long gap to TGE and the perceived dilution of public sale exclusivity. The price set in these rounds becomes the reference every later holder is measured against. Pump.fun's July 2025 ICO sold 330B PUMP, 33% of the 1T cap, at $0.004; a year later its FDV sat about 68% below the $4B valuation that ICO implied, leaving public buyers below their entry while insiders approaching the July 2026 cliff held a far lower cost basis.

Real World Examples

Monad (MON): a fixed-price exchange sale into an immediate TGE
View →
Coinbase opened Monad's public sale from November 17 to 22, 2025 at a fixed price of $0.025, with no auction mechanics, a clear FDV stated up front and an allocation model favouring smaller orders to reduce whale dominance. The sale closed on November 22 with TGE and mainnet on November 24, a tight transition, and the public sale tranche was fully unlocked at TGE.
Plasma (XPL): the same tranche, two lockups
View →
Plasma's public sale was 10% of supply, 1,000,000,000 XPL. Non-US purchasers received an immediate unlock at mainnet beta launch while US purchasers were locked for 12 months, releasing July 28, 2026. Assuming a 50/50 split, that put 500,000,000 XPL into the initial float and held the other 500,000,000 back, keeping initial released supply near 13% of total rather than 18%.
Pump.fun (PUMP): an ICO price that became the benchmark
View →
PUMP launched by ICO in July 2025, selling 330B tokens, 33% of the fixed 1T cap, at $0.004. By July 2026 its FDV was about 68% below the $4B valuation that sale implied, so public buyers sat below their entry price while Team and Existing Investor allocations entering the July 12, 2026 cliff held a far lower cost basis.
Aligned (ALIGN): a second public round, priced by auction
Aligned Layer sold 1.67% of total supply via CoinList in January 2025, raising up to $10M across multiple pricing tranches. More than a year later it announced a second public sale, an English auction for roughly 1% of supply running April 13 to 16, 2026. Tokenomist attributed the softer retail reaction to the extended gap between the first sale and TGE and to the perceived dilution of public sale exclusivity under a different pricing mechanism.
Ethereum (ETH): what a pre-2018 public sale looked like
View →
Before the ICO era ended, public sales were the dominant distribution channel rather than a small tranche. Tokenomist's allocation research cites Ethereum at roughly 83.5% of supply sold publicly and Binance at 50%, against a backdrop where many high market-cap tokens offered over 40% of total supply in their ICOs. Today's 5% public allocation is a direct reaction to how that period ended.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is a public sale different from a private round?
Access and price. A public sale is announced to the public and open to public participants through an ICO, IDO or IEO. A private round is not publicly accessible and goes to venture funds, seed buyers, strategic investors and project partners, usually at a lower valuation. Tokenomist keeps them as separate beneficiary categories precisely because the two behave differently at unlock.
Do public sale tokens vest?
Often barely. Tokenomist's research finds 75% of public sale vesting periods end before 8.8 months, and many tranches are fully unlocked at TGE, as Monad's was. That is why public supply typically reaches the market in a token's first year rather than sitting on a multi-year schedule like team and investor allocations. The main exception is regulatory: Plasma locked its US public buyers for 12 months while non-US buyers unlocked immediately.
Why did public sale allocations shrink so much?
The ICO era discredited them. Statis Group estimated around 80% of ICOs were scams, and research by Benedetti and Kostovetsky and by Howell and co-authors found 54% to 60% of total token supply was dumped during an ICO. Regulation tightened, STOs added KYC and cost, and founders shifted supply toward private rounds and treasury on the reasoning that those holders sustain value over a longer horizon. The category fell from about 35% of supply in 2018 to 5% in 2023.
Does the sale mechanism change anything for supply analysis?
It changes the entry price and how tightly the tranche is held, not the amount of supply. A fixed-price sale like Monad's states an FDV before anyone commits, so every buyer shares one cost basis. An auction like Aligned's second round lets the clearing price move, which spreads cost basis across participants and, in that case, drew criticism from earlier buyers who had paid a fixed tranche price. Either way the tranche size and its unlock date are what feed the emission schedule.

Related Terms

Track on Tokenomist

Supply-side analysis for educational purposes. Not financial advice. Verify assumption and precision labels on the relevant token page.
Tokenomist
Tokenomist.ai provides a complete solution for supply-side tokenomics data. Analyze future token emissions, track vesting schedules, and compare standardized tokenomics and allocation across projects to gain actionable insights